Corporative training through the social practice perspective
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.33228/scribes.2020.v1.10634Abstract
The main goal of this article is to understand how agents' learning practices are translated into daily actions in the face of corporate training. Organizational learning, from the perspective of theory of practice, is more than a teaching-learning process, but subjectivity and everyday (re) meaning that legitimizes organizational actions by correlating them with everyday practices. The methodology is a qualitative case study, applying twelve semi-open questionnaires in a family business. It is concluded that there is a resistance movement, which integrates the organizational texture, the formation of individual knowing, the influence on group knowledge, generating collective awareness that the daily practices are not coherent with the corporate training actions. However, there is no evidence of a direct clash, denoting that power and cultural dominance are relational dynamics, which interfere in the development of innovative actions in the organizational context, going against the intentionality of organizational learning actions as thought by the organization.
Downloads
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Published authors agree on the following items:
a. Authors keep copyright ownership whilst ceding to SCRIBES the right to a first publication. The material is also simultaneously licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 3.0 Unported Licence, which allows its publication with mutual recognition of authorship and initial publication through SCRIBES.
b. Authors are authorised to engage in third-party contracts independently, as long as they are pursuing a non-exclusive publication of the article originally published in this journal, such as having it appended to an institutional repository or included in a book as a chapter. Authorship and original publication by SCRIBES must still be acknowledged.
c. Authors have permission to and are encouraged to publish their research online, such as in institutional repositories or in their own personal web pages. They are allowed to do that before or after the editorial process, once it inspires any opportunistic alterations to be considered during the aforementioned process, and increase the content’s impact and value as a quotable work (read more on The Effect of Free Access).