Secretariat in power:
Functional configurations of general secretariats in latin american presidentialism
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.33228/scribes.2020.v1.10639Abstract
This article identifies diverse functional configurations of General Republic Secretariats of the Presidency in Latin America. Recognized as organs of Government Centers (GC), these are organizational fields that make up the decision center of the national executive power. In Latin America, particularly, the types of functions that develop these fields are indicators that point to styles and dynamics of political interactions of Presidents of the Republic. Starting from an institution and functional interpretations approach, eleven General Secretariats (GSs) in Latin American region were investigated. The data was collected from government sites, official documents and preview studies. The research is qualitative-quantitative, comparative, and content analysis research method was used for data interpretation. The results indicate that Government Centers’ GSs perform very diverse functions, can perform relevant political functions and are subject to the institutional and personal conditions of the Chief Executive.
Downloads
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Published authors agree on the following items:
a. Authors keep copyright ownership whilst ceding to SCRIBES the right to a first publication. The material is also simultaneously licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 3.0 Unported Licence, which allows its publication with mutual recognition of authorship and initial publication through SCRIBES.
b. Authors are authorised to engage in third-party contracts independently, as long as they are pursuing a non-exclusive publication of the article originally published in this journal, such as having it appended to an institutional repository or included in a book as a chapter. Authorship and original publication by SCRIBES must still be acknowledged.
c. Authors have permission to and are encouraged to publish their research online, such as in institutional repositories or in their own personal web pages. They are allowed to do that before or after the editorial process, once it inspires any opportunistic alterations to be considered during the aforementioned process, and increase the content’s impact and value as a quotable work (read more on The Effect of Free Access).