EVALUATING THE PPA PROGRAMS: A CASE STUDY OF THE IMPLANTATION OF THE PERFORMANCEBASED BUDGET
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.21118/apgs.v2i2.4021Keywords:
Avaliação de políticas sociais, Orçamento, Indicadores de Desempenho, Gestão por ResultadosAbstract
This research was carried out to verify the performance-based budgeting model introduced by the PPA 2000-2003 causes impact on formulation of the Federal Government´ budgeting. More specifically, whether the results of the evaluations of the PPA programs have influence on decisions regarding the allocation of the budgeting resources. Therefore, the research mainly uses the simple regression to show the relationship between the program performance and its allocative decision. Considering this is a case study, the research was restricted to programs of the Ministério do Desenvolvimento Social, da Educação e da Saúde. The results show no straightforward relationship between those two variables (program performance and allocative decision). Thus, it is concluded that the introduction of the performance-based budgeting model, despite some contributions, generally produced no significant changes in the federal budgeting management.
Key-Words: Social Policy Evaluation; Budgeting; Performance Indicators; Management focused on outcomes.
Downloads
References
L.C; CUNILL-GRAU, N. Responsabilização na adminitração pública. São Paulo:
CLAD/Fundap, 2006.
BIRD. Management and Evaluation within the Plano Plurianual: institutionalization
without Impact?. Washington: World Bank, 2006.
BRASIL, República Federativa do. Decreto n° 2.829, de 29 de outubro de 1998. Disponível
em< https://www.portalsof.planejamento.gov.br/>. Acesso em: 10 de mar. 2009.
__________. Lei nº 9.989, de 24 de julho de 2000 (PPA 2000-2003). Disponível em:
<http://intranet2/internet/orcamento/planopluri/ppa20002003/lei9989.pdf>. Acesso em: 10 de
mar. 2009.
__________. Lei n° 10.933, de 11 de Agosto de 2004 (PPA 2004-2007). Disponível em:
<http://intranet2/internet/orcamento/planopluri/ppa20042007/lei10933.pdf>. Acesso em: 10
de mar. 2009.
__________. Plano Gestão Pública para um Brasil de Todos. Brasília, 2004. Disponível
em: < http://www.planejamento.gov.br>. Acesso em:
__________. Ministério do Planejamento, Orçamento e Gestão. Manual de Elaboração e
Gestão do PPA 2000-2003. Brasília, 1998.
__________. Plano Gestão Pública para um Brasil de Todos. Brasília, 2004. Disponível
em: < http://www.planejamento.gov.br>. Acesso em: 12 de mar. 2009.
__________. Manual de Avaliação do PPA 2004/2007, Ano-Base 2005. Brasília: Dezembro
de 2006. Disponível em: <http://www.planobrasil.gov.br/>. Acesso em: 7 de mar. 2009.
__________. PPA 2004/2007. Relatório Anual de Avaliação – Exercício 2004. Brasília,
set/2005. . Disponível em: <http://www.planobrasil.gov.br/>. Acesso em: 15 de mar. 2009.
__________. PPA 2004/2007. Relatório Anual de Avaliação – Exercício 2005. Brasília,
set/2006. . Disponível em: <http://www.planobrasil.gov.br/>. Acesso em: 5 de mar. 2009.
BRUMBY, J.; ROBINSON, M. Does Performance Budgeting Work: An Analytical Review
of the Empirical Literature. IMF Working Paper 05/210. Washington: International
Monetary Fund, 2005.
CAIDEN, N.; WILDAVSKY, A. Planning and Budgeting in Poor Countries: comparative
studies in behavioral sciences. New York: John Wiley & Sons, 1974.
CALMOM, K.; GUSSO, D. A Experiência de Avaliação do Plano Plurianual (PPA) do
Governo Federal no Brasil. Planejamento e Políticas Públicas, nº 25. Brasília: IPEA,
jun/dez 2002.
DAVIS, O.; DEMPSTER, M.; WILDAVSKY, A. A Theory of the Budgetary Process.
American Political Science Review, Vol LX, nº 8, set/1966.
DIAMOND, J. From Program to Performance Budgeting: The Challenge for Emerging
Market Economies. IMF Working Paper 03/169. Washington: International Monetary Fund,
2003.
__________. Establishing a Performance Management Framework of Government. IMF
Working Paper 05/50. Washington: International Monetary Fund, 2005.
GARCES, A.; SILVEIRA, J. P. Gestão pública orientada para resultados no Brasil. Revista
do Serviço Público, ano 53, nº 4, out-dez 2002.
KEY, V. O. Jr. Ausência de uma Teoria Orçamentária – uma teoria para guiar a alocação de
recursos. In: GIACOMONI, James; PAGNUSSAT, José Luiz (org.). Planejamento e
Orçamento (coletânea volume 2). Brasília, ENAP, 2006.
MELKERS, J.; WILLOUGHBY, K. The State of the States: Performance-Based Budgeting
Requirements in 47 out of 50. Public Administration Review. Vol. 58, nº 1, 1998.
__________. Models of Performance-Measurement Use in Local Governments:
Understanding Budgeting, Communication, and Lasting Effects. Public Administration
Review, Vol. 65, nº, mar/abr 2005.
OECD. Modernising Government: The Way Forward. Paris, 2005.
OSBORNE, D.; HUTCHINSON, P. The price of government: getting the results we need
in an age of permanent fiscal crisis. New York: Basic Books, 2006.
SECRETARIA DE PLANEJAMENTO E INVESTIMENTOS ESTRATÉGICOS
(SPI/MPOG). Plano Plurianual 2000-2003, uma análise dos quatro anos de implementação,
mimeo, 2004.
SHICK, A. Conflitos e soluções no orçamento federal. In: GIACOMONI, James;
PAGNUSSAT, José Luiz (org.). Planejamento e Orçamento (coletânea volume 2). Brasília,
ENAP, 2006.
YIN, R. Case Study Research: Design and Methods. Applied Social Research Methods
Series, Vol, 5. California: Sage Publications, 2002.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Authors who publish in the Journal of Public Administration and Management Social (APGS) must agree to the following terms:
• Authors retain copyright and give the journal the rightof first publication with the work simultaneously licensed underthe Creative Commons Attribution License, permitting sharingwork with the recognition of the work of authorship and publicationstarting in this journal.
• Authors have authorization to assume additional contractsseparately for non-exclusive distribution of the work releasepublished in this journal (eg. publish in institutional repositories oras a book), with an acknowledgment of its publicationstarting this journal.
• Authors are permitted and encouraged to post theirwork online (eg, in institutional repositories or on their websitepersonnel) at any point before or during the submission process, asit can generate criticism and helpful suggestions, as well asincrease the impact and citation of published work.
• Authors reserve the right of the editors of this journal to make in theoriginal works, alterations of normative order, orthographic andgrammatical, aiming at complying with its editorial policy and keep thedefault cult of language, respecting, however, the authors' style.
• Authors assume exclusive responsibility for their opinionsgiven in the articles published in this journal.
